
Tensions rise as Liaison Committee explores integration for CVRD, CVEDS
Members of a committee investigating the potential for integration of Comox Valley Economic Development Society (CVEDS) operations with the regional district agreed on a short list of possible shared services at their inaugural meeting last week.
The committee instructed Comox Valley Regional District and CVEDS employees to consider collaboration on financial accounting, the audit process and related costs, office space, website and communications and human resources including staff evaluation and training. Visitor Centre operations were also seen as worthy of discussion by the committee and a presentation on the topic was requested for the next meeting.
But there wasn’t complete agreement or clarity on the larger issue of the scope of the committee’s authority and responsibilities.
Deana Simpkin, president of the CVEDS board, asked whether she and board members Mike Opal, Bruce Turner and Paul Ives were full members of the committee or serving in an advisory capacity. Turner wondered if the board’s role, in general, had been changed.
In his opening remarks, Committee Chair Doug Hillian addressed that issue saying he hoped the group would work collaboratively and that their work would result in a closer relationship between CVEDS and the CVRD.
“This is uncharted territory, there have been significant contract changes,” Hillian said. “The rationale is that the relationship in the past has not been as close as it might be and this has led to conflict.”
Hillian assured CVEDS board members they were full participants in the Liaison Committee and called the committee’s work a “shared responsibility.”
And he added that “nothing was off the table” for discussion and invited “general comments” from everyone.
But tensions rose when Area B Director Arzeena Hamir commented on the committee’s responsibility “to collaborate in the ongoing review and clarification of contract deliverables,” according to Section 15 of the new CVEDS contract.
And she later asked CVEDS Executive Director John Watson a series of questions about a late three-month report, why minutes of the Economic Recovery Task Force haven’t been made public and why the society hadn’t held a required Annual General Meeting in 17 months.
That didn’t sit well with CVEDS board member Paul Ives who characterized comments about “deliverables” — actions required by the contract — as committee members “taking shots at each other.”
“I’m troubled by this line of questioning,” he said. “Why are we putting CVEDS staff on the hot seat? The CVRD questions are inappropriate.”
Hamir responded that it was “definitely within the purview” of the committee to ask questions of staff and appropriate to check on contract deliverables.
Chair Hillian said if the committee was going to work collaboratively and with transparency, then questions could be asked. CVRD General Manager of Planning Scott Smith also approved the questioning.
Hillian suggested CVEDS could answer Hamir’s specific questions at the next committee meeting when he hoped Watson could “attend the whole meeting.” Watson came late via teleconference to the first meeting and left early.
COMPLAINTS ABOUT FUNDING
CVEDS board member Bruce Turner, who attended via teleconferencing, said that reduced funding from the regional district had made it impossible for the board to meet its fiduciary responsibility. He and other board members said the new budget was hampering operations and that a reduced staff didn’t have time to fulfil all their reporting requirements.
Simpkin said there is “a backlog behind the scenes” because one staff member chose to leave and CVEDS had laid off three Visitor Centre staff. The society currently has eight staff members.
She said this lack of resources has put pressure on staff, many of whom are working from home.
For CVRD Director Hamir, the funding concerns raised the question of where regional district responsibility ends and where CVEDS responsibility begins.
“Both boards were aware of the terms of the agreement when they signed the contract, including the funding,” she said. “The contract spells out what needs to be done and when. The ‘how to do it’ is up to CVEDS. These are separate jurisdictions.”
CVRD Director Maureen Swift said the funding issue was the purpose of exploring greater integration with the CVRD.
“CVEDS can’t operate as it has in the past with the new contract,” she said.
Hillian closed the meeting hoping for better collaboration.
“It’s inevitable there would be a little tension considering the difficulty in getting to this point,” he said.
WHAT’S NEXT
When CVRD directors couldn’t agree on CVEDS future by the March 31 contract deadline, they chose to sign a two-year agreement with the understanding that the matter was unresolved. That agreement provided for the formation of a Liaison Committee comprising members from the CVRD and CVEDS boards as a means to assure better communication and that deliverables were meeting CVRD expectations.
The next meeting of the Liaison Committee is at 1.30 pm on Oct. 19.
Meanwhile, the CVRD board is holding a two-day workshop next week in an attempt to find common ground among directors about the future of economic development.
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR COMMENTS
Decafnation encourages comments and a free exchange of ideas about our articles. Please limit your comments to fewer than 200 words. Longer comments may be trimmed.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Another environmental dilemma: Do biosolids pose a public health risk?
Comox Valley electoral area directors told land applications of biosolids pose a danger to humans and a legal risk for the regional district, but the CVRD has invested heavily to produce a more highly treated Class A composting product
Stotan Falls petition called “trojan horse,” 3L serves notice of logging Jan. 21
Anonymous petition launched to convince Courtenay Council to annex 3L Developments property to save Stotan Falls; critics call the petition a “trojan horse” and urge people not to sign. Meanwhile, 3L notices homeowners it will start logging in two weeks
B.C.’s 150th anniversary provides an opportunity to right a historic wrong
Nanaimo-Ladysmith MP Paul Manly writes that British Columbia could advance reconciliation with First Nations on southern Vancouver Island next year and at the same time protect watersheds, endangered species and create sustainable economic opportunities.
Comox Valley receives $9.251 million to offset COVID-19 pandemic economic impact
Four Comox Valley local governments received a total of $9.251 million as part of the $425 million BC Restart Grant Program
CVRD starts the process to create a regional parks service, it could take until 2022
With logging threatening several large natural assets, the Comox Valley Regional District voted this week to begin a process to re-activate a regional parks service. It could 12 months or more.
CV governments apply for infrastructure funds to ease pandemic economic recovery
All four Comox Valley governments apply for one-time, 100% provincial funds for ready-to-go infrastructure projects that can create immediate jobs and help communities recover from the economic impacts of the pandemic.
3L Developments prefers to sell Riverwood land but vows to log it and extract gravel
3L Developments signalled to the Comox Valley Regional District today that it would like to sell its nearly 500 acres of property in the Puntledge Triangle and warned that there was only a small window of opportunity before it proceeds to log the timber and extract gravel from the site
Regional District again rejects 3L Developments, amending regional growth strategy
The Comox Valley Regional District has again rejected a request from 3L Developments Inc. to amend the community’s Regional Growth Strategy.
BC Seafood Festival cancelled at last minute, two more CVEDS directors quit
The Comox Valley Economic Development Society pulled the plug on next week’s BC Seafood Festival after public health officials stepped in this week to ensure pandemic protocols were being followed
The Week: Comox has a hissy over CV Economic Development Society changes
Local governments are taking oversight seriously and pushing the CV Economic Development Society toward new directions that will benefit broader sectors of the community. Comox Town Council doesn’t like it.
The reason for this the politicians with week needs try to run Politic under a Volunteers banner. They don’t like to be blames for their screws up. They all know that WRONG how can we get away with it. Those Regional District are a lost CAUSE why they existed no one know if they do not willing to tell the public. The manager here Greg Fletcher Month Waddington telling us they are not responsible for our COMMUNITY FUTURES. The Minister responsible for (CF) tell us they are responsible to the Community they serve Who would that be ????? MARS PLUTO VENUS the MOON or we do what ever we want no much people complain we have pretty good comptrollers a Democracy with a broken leg. A liaison committees who would be the watchdog for that ? The same argument on a different Banner The only way is the POLITICIANS run the Show and the PUBLIC have a web page to Complained how good or bad they are doing that is Democracy .To much Money is Misuse without the public Knowledge. We have exactly the same Problems here a Money Grab for people with the biggest mouth.
George, Thank you for your continued excellent reporting on the issue of CVEDS. Since moving here from AB and being peripherally involved in the tourism sector I have tried to figure out what or who this CVEDS is and what it is supposed to do. They seem to fly completely under the radar. I completely agree with the comments above. It’s a non performing money pit with poor leadership, no accountability and no tangible results. Can anyone name a single business that they can legitimately claim to have attracted here?
I was very proud of Mayor and council here in Cumby for putting them on the spot and pulling the funding when they provided no tangible reason why Cumberland should keep handing over their money. I just wish the other jurisdictions could figure this out. We need a complete change of direction in Economic development.
The concept that the Visitor’s Centre staff have had very little to do in the last 6 months with few visitors makes me wonder why they were not capable of fulfilling their other duties. The CVED has laid off at least one senior, very experienced staff member, while keeping junior members (ostensibly to save more money), which seems to have left them with people unable to get their job done. There seems to be no administrative (high cost) positions vacated. These people have been buttering their own bread too long and need to justify their costly existence or get the boot (probably contracted to get a “golden” handshake if this happens, unlike their hapless staff). Hire a manager for the business centre, staff it with volunteers and write the rest off as an expensive mistake.
Much applause for Area A Director Arzeena Hamir who is asking the legitimate questions that any thinking, responsible director would do. The CVEDS board members and ED are making too many excuses for non-performance on clearly outlined deliverables. As for the soap opera style courtroom drama that certain CVEDS board members appear to be bringing to the discussions, it only telegraphs to the public that it’s time to pull back the curtain on their operations. Kudos also to Doug Hillian for “going high” when it appears that a couple of CVEDS board members are “going low.” Everyone involved is playing with public tax dollars, so transparency and professionalism are essential.
I wish I could express my opinion as good as you . There is lot of Manure under those blankets that could be expose to WAKE-UP the people POWER .