Regional District again rejects 3L Developments, amending regional growth strategy
The Comox Valley Regional District today rejected for a second time the Riverwood housing development.
3L Developments Inc. had applied in 2017 to the regional district board and again in May of this year to the regional district’s Electoral Areas Services Commission to support amending the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS).
The company wants to develop about 500 acres in a triangle between the Browns and Puntledge rivers, but that isn’t allowed under the RGS. Their previous application was rejected by the regional district board in 2018.
But after vetting the current proposal with Comox Valley local governments, agencies and First Nations over the summer, the commission voted 2-1 to accept the regional district staff recommendation and refuse this new request.
The commission had referred the proposal to Comox Valley agencies, First Nations and the Courtenay, Cumberland and Comox municipalities for feedback. None of them responded in support of the proposal.
After a lengthy discussion that was at times testy, Commission members Daniel Arbour (Area A director) and Arzeena Hamir (Area B director) voted in favour of Arbour’s motion to refuse the request. Edwin Grieve (Area C director) voted against it.
Earlier in the meeting, Rob Buchan, a retired municipal planner representing 3L Developments, warned that the ownership group led by Dave Dutcyvich would pursue other interests on the property, including logging and gravel extraction.
Buchan presented the commission with a revised version of the proposed Riverwood development that moved the residential lots south of the Puntledge River and included space allotted for a Farmer’s Market and an ‘agriplex.’
He argued that because the local governments and agencies were referred the first version of their 2020 Riverwood proposal, but had not seen their revised version, that the referral feedback was invalid.
And he said that any feedback would only be valid if it was based on the merits of amending the RGS rather than focused “on some general concept” of the Riverwood plan.
Alana Mullaly, the CVRD’s senior manager for planning and protective services, said she was confident that local government planning directors and Chief Administration Officers understood the referral process and that they knew what they were looking at and why.
Arbour said the revised proposal felt a little like a “bait and switch” ploy by the company.
“There was an extensive public process in 2017-2018 that resulted in rejection. I expected this second kick at the can would have addressed those concerns with your best foot forward,” he said to Buchan.
3L Developments Inc. wants their property designated at a “settlement node” under the RGS that would allow denser subdivision.
But Arbour pointed out the company could apply to the City of Courtenay to expand its boundaries to include Riverwood, or to support an RGS amendment application to the regional district board.
TENSION AMONG DIRECTORS
Grieve, who chairs the commission, at times, invoked Biblical references and at other times seemed to chide the other directors for having “little mindsets.”
Grieve was enthusiastic during the meeting about working with 3L Developments to find a compromise that would add new parkland to the regional district’s portfolio. And making a deal would missout on a “once in a lifetime” opportunity.
“it’s all about the parkland,” he said. “It’s sad to see our natural jewels disappear.”
“Beseeching” Directors Hamir and Arbour to refer the 3L request to the full regional district board to consider initiating the amendment process, Grieve questioned the RGS sacred status.
“The RGS isn’t some chapter out of the Bible. It wasn’t handed down from the top of Mt. Washington,” he said. “It isn’t written in stone.”
He urged Hamir and Arbour to look at the “bigger picture” of gaining parkland and saving access to Stotan Falls, the popular summer swimming spot.
“We’ve got to get out of our little mindsets,” he said.
Hamir took exception to that comment, which she interpreted as Grieve calling her and Arbour small-minded.
WHAT THE REFERRALS SAID
None of the feedback sought by the Electoral Area Services Commission supported the application to amend the Regional Growth Strategy.
Courtenay, Comox, Cumberland and K’omoks First Nation all recommended denying 3L Developments proposal. Other agencies such as the Vancouver Island Health and the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure raised numerous concerns about the Riverwood development.
Cumberland and Courtenay recommended rejecting the proposal because it is inconsistent with the Regional Growth Strategy. Comox agreed, but added that the Town Council was interested “in a process which would return Stotan Falls to public access and use.”
K’omoks First Nations said the “application is located within the K’omoks statement of intent area; it is the interest of the K’omoks Nation to respectfully maintain our rights and access to the lands and resources throughout our territory.”
The Ministry of Transportation raised concerns about having a stormwater management plan, a geotechnical hazard assessment and confirmation of potable water and sewage disposal for each lot. They also raised the issue of dedicating the private logging road that bisects the property as a public road.
The Vancouver Island Health Authority had numerous concerns and recommendations. High on that list was that 3L Developments prove there is a sustainable water source on the property sufficient to meet the needs of the full development.
They also noted that Riverwood would be a car-dependent area that would never be walkable.
“We encourage the CVRD to consider this impact, contain urban sprawl and create complete, livable communities in line with Object 1A of the Regional Growth Strategy which states, local housing close to existing services,” VIHA wrote.
Other feedback included a comment from the Comox Valley Coalition to End Homelessness on the 3L Developments claim that Riverwood would provide affordable housing. The coalition rejected that claim.
“The interests of the coalition are unaffected as the issues of affordable and non-market housing do not appear to be addressed by the 3L proposal,” they wrote.
HOW WE GOT HERE
3L Developments Inc. purchased the approximately 500-acre property in 2007 and quickly logged portions of the site. In the same year, the company also proposed to develop a self-contained community to be called Riverwood.
At the time, the regional district was conducting a community-wide process to develop the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) that was adopted as Bylaw 120 in 2010.
The regional district board originally rejected the Riverwood proposal but reconsidered it in 2018 as an application to amend the RGS at the direction of the BC Supreme Court. The regional district rejected the proposal for a second time because it was inconsistent with the RGS. 3L Developments then started another legal action to overturn that decision, but it was unsuccessful in the courts.
The regional district then amended the RGS itself to restrict who could propose amendments to the RGS. Previously, the Comox Valley Regional District was the only one in the province that allowed private parties to apply for RGS amendments.
Now only a member municipality, the Electoral Area Services Commission or the full CVRD board can request an RGS amendment and they can do so on behalf of an external agency or private party.
In May of this year, 3L Developments tried again to get approval for Riverwood by asking the Electoral Areas Services Commission to support an amendment application and refer it to the full regional district board.
The Electoral Area Services Commission voted to seek feedback from other municipalities, external agencies and First Nations before making a decision.
After receiving feedback on the application and sharing it with 3L Developments, the CVRD staff report says the developers revised their application to eliminate commercial areas, increase residential units and add areas identified as “Farmers Market” and “Agriplex.”
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
CV governments apply for infrastructure funds to ease pandemic economic recovery
All four Comox Valley governments apply for one-time, 100% provincial funds for ready-to-go infrastructure projects that can create immediate jobs and help communities recover from the economic impacts of the pandemic.
3L Developments prefers to sell Riverwood land but vows to log it and extract gravel
3L Developments signalled to the Comox Valley Regional District today that it would like to sell its nearly 500 acres of property in the Puntledge Triangle and warned that there was only a small window of opportunity before it proceeds to log the timber and extract gravel from the site
CVRD initiates discussions about Economic Development Society reforms
Conflicting views about sustainable economic growth have caused Comox Valley Regional District directors to initiate discussions that might reform or replace an organization that it created in 1988
Tensions rise as Liaison Committee explores integration for CVRD, CVEDS
The Comox Valley Regional District may have signed a two-year agreement with the Economic Development Society but the work of reforming that 32-year-old entity carries on through a select committee and board-wide workshops
A shifting political climate means change for 32-year-old society, but board still divided
A changing political climate that brought new faces and fresh perspectives to the Comox Valley Regional District boardroom has thrust the three-decade-old Comox Valley Economic Development Society into an uncertain future.
No CV economic recovery plan yet, lack of destination marketing raises concerns
Nearly seven months after the BC lockdown to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the Comox Valley Economic Task Force has yet to form any plans to help local businesses and the region’s destination marketing office has been “repurposed”
3L Developments is back, and again asking to amend the Regional Growth Strategy
3L Developments Ltd. has returned to the Comox Valley Regional District to ask the Electoral Services Committee to push an RGS amendment on its behalf to the full board. That would clear the way for a new version of Riverwood
Supreme Court rules in favor of CVRD in 3L Developments lawsuit
The BC Supreme Court has decided in favor of the Comox Valley Regional District in a lawsuit brought by 3L Developments over amending the Regional Growth Strategy
Cumberland mayor to shine light on bullying in local politics, nonprofits
How to recognize and deal with bullying in Comox Valley politics and nonprofits is the subject of a workshop organized by Cumberland Mayor Leslie Baird
Rural Comox Valley zoning bylaw “more permissive”
The Comox Valley Regional District is rolling out an updated zoning bylaw this month for rural areas A, B and C that encourages home-based business, agriculture and sustainable energy
Well, that’s the last time Mr. Grieve gets the votes of Area C RD. Wow Ed! You have lost your way! The RGS is very much an unchangeable legal document and it is expected that our representatives will stand up to high density developments in this area. How bout 3L buys a piece of land that *is zoned for the big profit, high density housing development project it wants. Then they can stop wasting their time wheeling and dealing and bullying this community and its’ representatives. Way to sell out and fold Edwin! Super disappointed!
Thanks to Decafnation for reporting so clearly and giving the background on the 3L proposal & process over the past 13 years. I had not been paying attention, assuming a rejection is a rejection is a rejection.
Clearly 3L has one agenda no matter how many revisions it submits; to make a fortune on an unsustainable unsuitable housing development that smacks of 1970s vision of suburbia. Note the mention of “agriplex”; Edwin Grieve’s pet project. It’s time to catch up to 2020 Mr Grieve or move on/out.
I participated in the regional growth strategy workshops in 2008. It was a huge learning experience with knowledgable young people, tuned in to the issues of the time. I was convinced that we had to conserve every liter of water, as there was going to be drought in the foreseeable future. Later , I realized that the Comox Valley has one of the most sustainable, clean water supplies, anywhere, in Comox Lake.
I volunteered on the Area B Advisory Planning Commission and realized that there are a few committed citizens who care to come out to public meetings. Policy is decided by staff and it is sometimes difficult to understand, but they are the professionals. They often do not get it right, in isolation, Most , like 99 percent of citizens don,t care, so staff make decisions.
Saratoga beach was apparently designated as the area for growth in the last review of the RGS. A very long walking distance from Courtenay or Campbell River. Then there is the Union Bay development, proceeding after meandering for two decades. Also a long walk.
The developer , 3 L, proposing the developement, acts much like the Chinese Government.in dealing with Canadian citizens and soveriety. It seem they are bullies and deserve little consideration for their proposal. However the BC goverment who gave away this land and the river bed, need to make things right. Buy it and make it a Park. Ronna Rae , you can make it happen.
Ronna Rae, Please only pay what 3 L paid, plus improvements, but get on with it.
Crown Isle has lots of land in the core . They only only need water meters to align with the wise young visionaries who participated in the sustainabilty study and RGS of 2008.
It is time to incorporate this parcel into City of Courtenay, (refer “The Ridge” to the South) and provide infrastructure via Duncan Bay Main, phased DCC’s but up front bonus to reflect initial costs of City.
Lack of small non ALR parcels in CV leads to hyper inflated values. Alternate development for non residential use reduces potential future tax base.
Generous concession by Developer of Parkland and Riverfront access.
Unique location allows for 15 minute ride by electric bike to DT Courtenay Retail shops, services and facilities.
We are a prime destination of twenty first century Penturbia movement – 10 – 20 year build out.
BRAVO RGS for maintaining the plan. that is what w, the voters, elected you to do.
Thank you from future residents and wildlife that cannot do not have such a vote.
E L Donaldson
No wonder that Director Grieve is upset.
At a recent EASC meeting, when 125k was approved as grant to the Hornby Arts Center, Director Grieve agreed, but mentioned that in the future he would expect Director Arbour to support his favourite projects, kind of like US “horsetrading politics”. Small town local government politics at it’s best….,.
Given the persistence of 3L in moving this objectionable project forward, we, as local citizens and the people who elected our representatives on the regional district board, need to support them in keeping this development out of the regional district. 3L owners are not the kind of people to give up. While it might be nice to have Stotan Falls as a regional park area, it would come at the expense of the precepts of the Regional Growth Strategy and principles for adaptation to climate change. A 700 unit housing development miles from any existing infrastructure is not what this valley needs. We need to concentrate all future development in the existing boundaries and there are lot of opportunities there.
After this declaration; it is obvious that Mr. Grieve is not in tune with the community he pretends to serve, maybe it is time to ask him to step down and resign to a position that is meant to represent the interest of the community, not his opinion. He was not elected to tell us what to do, we, the community, tell him what to do, he is an elected official, not a consultant:
“Grieve, who chairs the commission, at times, invoked Biblical references and at other times seemed to chide the other directors for having “little mindsets.”
Grieve was enthusiastic during the meeting about working with 3L Developments to find a compromise that would add new parkland to the regional district’s portfolio. And making a deal would missout on a “once in a lifetime” opportunity.
“it’s all about the parkland,” he said. “It’s sad to see our natural jewels disappear.”
Going forward with this development sets a dangerous precedent. Who will be next in line to want to develop in an area not suitable for development?
Affordable housing? Who sets these rates? Hogwash
Build up in the town core.
Transit is there and most things in walking distance.
Mr. Grieve, look for a new job as you don’t seem to understand what your job is.